| |
VIDEO:
Debating Mark-to-Market Accounting (Janet Tavakoli & Bill Isaac)
Bloomberg
TV Oct. 1
Janet
Tavakoli argues for mark-to-market accounting for toxic assets
in trading books, other areas where it is currently required, and
vehicles into which these assets have been or may be transferred..
Bill Isaac, former head of the FDIC and now with Legg Mason, argues
against
it. He
seems unaware of the malicious mischief in recent years in structured
products and plays right into the hands of those who woudl avoid
regulation and cover up problems. Unfortunately, Congress was being
counseled by thos who are against mark-to-market accounting.
JT
Note: Warren Buffett advocates mark-to-market accounting for the
bailout in an interview with
Charlie
Rose (and Warren Buffett) on October 1 and CNNmoney
on October 2, 2008. He proposed another viable alternative
to the Bills floating in Congress. He proposes to let private equity
investors
put up 20%. The U.S. Treasury will put
up 80%
with
the following
terms:
it gets paid back first, receives interest on its investment, and
gets a share of the profits. This is a way of ensuring market pricing
and allowing the banks to delever while the Treasury (the only
source of a large enough balance sheet) levers up with the protection
of a 20% cushion and mark-to-market pricing.]
Among
other reasons to urge mark-to-market accounting, there is a multiplier
effect of losses (for some securitizations) because“total
loss” tranches
were transferred to other securitizations (especially synthetically),
so that some CDOs and CDO-squareds are largely worthless. No
one can tell which securitizations have this problem without
analyzing each one. The Treasury will buy a pig in a poke. This
is not
a matter of opinion or “different views” it is a
matter of fact.
I
am all for buying time for a forced restructuring, but financial
institutions need to mark their assets to get the market out
of the deep freeze. These
are not “fire sale” prices in many cases. Many
CDOs deserve the low prices since they were partially constructed
out of air. This uncertainty of what
is nearly worthless and what has value has frozen the markets.
Treasury Secretary
Henry Paulson was unsuccessful in his first attempt to grab
absolute power (see section 8), so new bailout
plans include “Andy Fastow (remember Enron?)” accounting,
which effectively thwart oversight. A lot of work has been
done in the past couple of days to give Congress a bad education.
If Paulson is allowed to use “hold to maturity” pricing,
excessively high prices can be paid, and assets that have permanent
losses can be easily covered up—just as investment
banks covered up their permanent losses on securitized assets
for
many quarters. In other words, if you do not use
mark-to-market accounting, it is much easier to lie. Therefore
I recommend that we make it more difficult for anyone to lie
to American taxpayers, and
say we should adopt mark-to-market accounting. If we absolutely
had to sell, what would we get for our money? We have a right
to know.
It is not in the interests
of U.S. citizens and taxpayers to abandon mark-to-market
accounting
for
a proposal in which taxpayer
funds are being used. If we would have to sell the assets
at a loss due to downward moves in market prices, we have
a right
to know that. If the assets have permanent losses so that
even if we hold to maturity we would have losses, we have
a right
to know that too. At any given time, we have a right to know
what our “investment” is worth (but
I recommed this “investment” should
not be made and we should pursue a better alternative).
Congress seems to have decided that U.S. citizens cannot handle
the truth.
The Act extends
the SEC's authority to suspend mark-to-market
accounting (FAS
157) when it is "in the public interest and
protects investors." Do not expect a thaw in the market
freeze. The Act buries problems and prolongs price
uncertainty.
This
a huge mistake. FASB board members support mark-to-market
accounting, especially in illiquid markets. The
SEC should, too. This provision is ridiculous and seems meant
to
promote hold-to-maturity
pricing for credit derivatives trading books and CDO portfolios.
The danger is that Federal portfolio managers can claim they
are making money on carry trades while the assets are declining
in value due to defaults or permanent value destruction of
collateral. This situation can continue for a long time to
create the false
appearance of profitability. In other words, U.S. taxpayers
can be told they are making money on their $700 billion investment,
when in reality they are losing money. I would rather know
the
market price, even if the news is bad news.
Janet
Tavakoli is the president of Tavakoli Structured Finance, a
Chicago-based firm that provides consulting to financial institutions
and institutional investors. Ms. Tavakoli has more than 20
years of experience in senior investment banking positions,
trading, structuring and marketing structured financial products.
She is a former adjunct professor of derivatives at the University
of Chicago's Graduate School of Business.
She
is the author of: Credit
Derivatives & Synthetic Structures (John
Wiley & Sons, 1998, 2001) and Structured
Finance & Collateralized Debt Obligations (John
Wiley & Sons, September 2008).
Dear
Mr. Buffett: What An Investor Learns 1,269 Miles From Wall
Street will be released
January 9, 2009 and is available for pre-order on Amazon.. Janet
Tavakoli takes you into the world of Warren Buffett by way
of the recent global credit and mortgage loan crisis. In correspondence
and discussion with him over 3 years, they both saw the writing
on the wall. Dear Mr. Buffett is
a witty well-told account of how principle triumphs over greed
and panic, and is a must-read for all those seeking the timeless
wisdom that has beaten, and continues to beat, the market.
Clients
of Tavakoli Structured Finance
have the benefit of proprietary research, which
is not available in any other paid or public forum. Clients
also commission proprietary research and analysis.
TSF
makes some information available to the general public. Please
click here for other articles.
|